Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people – IELTS Writing Task 2 Argumentative Essays

An IELTS argumentative essay requires you to present and support your viewpoint on a specific issue or statement. In IELTS Writing Task 2, students are asked to write a formal essay of at least 250 words, in 4-5 paragraphs based on the given writing task 2 essay topics. The task is similar for both Academic and General Training with regards to the type of questions and the scoring, but the topics given for General Training will be slightly easier than Academic. Given below is an argumentative essay with sample answers that will help you to practise and get a good score and aim for a Band 9 score in the IELTS writing exam.

Before Diving into the Given IELTS Writing Task 2 Answer, Know the Secret 9 Expert Tips to Score a Band 8+ Now!

Question

Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think having a younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?

Band 8.0 Sample Essay:

It is true that higher positions are usually held by older members in many organizations these days. While some people believe younger people would demonstrate better leadership, it is in my opinion that senior managers possess more advantages over their younger counterparts in leading a company.

To begin with, it is usually difficult for the young to compete with the old in terms of experience. those who have gained adequate experience can more effectively manage to lead the individuals of an organization than those who do not. The reason for this is that business matters often require the people in charge to have not only the knowledge of coping with problematic situations but also strong nerves to calmly find a feasible solution. As a result, years of experience in a relevant position tend to make the elderly better candidates than those who are relatively young and new to the tasks.

Another advantage belonging to aged people is that they are likely to receive more support from the people in an organization. As the time spent working with the staff of the senior is often longer, they can understand their colleagues better, achieving more popularity. It is interpersonal communication skills and approval of other people that can tremendously affect the success of a leader. Younger members, on the other hand, will need more time to make contributions over time to prove themselves worthy.

In conclusion, I believe that critical positions of authority should be given to senior staff members for the certain reasons mentioned rather than the young.

Useful Vocabulary:

• Prevalent (adj): existing very commonly or happening often
==>Health problems such as obesity and diabetes are prevalent amongst young people in developing countries today.
• To demonstrate sth(v): to show or make something clear
==>The problems of unsatisfactory productivity which Canadian workers are facing demonstrate the importance of enhancing the quality of learning and teaching in tertiary education.
• Senior (adj): older
==>Senior family members are expected to set an example to the younger children in order that these junior members can adopt good manners in their adulthood.
• Leadership (n): the set of characteristics that make a good leader
==>The lack of leadership in young and inexperienced directors can sometimes put the company in jeopardy.
• Problematic (adj): difficult to deal with or to understand; full of problems; not certain to be successful
==>Despite acknowledging the dangers of fast food, many consumers find it problematic to switch to a healthier food choice.
• Feasible (adj): that is possible and likely to be achieved
==>With the public support of abandoning polluting vehicles, the prospect of the improved air quality seems more feasible.

Band 9 Sample Essay:

People have different views about whether older or younger people are more suitable for important positions in organisations. While I accept that old individuals have significantly important qualities, I believe younger ones are more likely to become good leaders.

On the one hand, elderly people can be good leaders for some reasons. Firstly, as old people have worked for many years, they have accumulated much more work experience compared to younger workers. This might allow them to make wiser decisions and bring success to the company they work for. Secondly, older people are often more respected by others. Therefore, they can have a more powerful voice within the company, and people are more likely to listen to them. If leaders are young, they might find it hard to influence other employees.

On the other hand, I believe it will be better if young people take up important positions. The first reason is that since young individuals tend to be physically stronger, they can handle big responsibilities and much work. Being a leader requires people to work with much pressure, and old people are often not capable of doing that. Additionally, younger people are usually more creative, so they are more likely to find newer and better improvements which benefit the entire organisation. For example, a young manager can come up with a new advertising strategy for a product, which contributes to the increasing sales of the company.

In conclusion, while I accept that old individuals can be good leaders of an organisation, I believe these important positions should be given to younger people.

Useful Vocabulary:

• accumulate: to gradually get more and more of something over a period of time
  ==>Children gradually accumulate knowledge as they grow up.
• wise: sensible (example: a wise decision)
• handle: to deal with a situation, a person, an area of work or a strong emotion
  ==>A new man was appointed to handle the crisis.
• capable of doing something: having the ability or qualities necessary for doing something
  ==>He was barely capable of writing his own name.